One of the big debates in the realm of going into private practice is if a practitioner should accept insurance or be strictly private pay. We all need and want to be be paid for our services. So how do you decide if you want to begin taking insurance vs. just having a strictly private pay or payment from the client at the time of the session?
Most of the “buzz” from practitioners giving this kind of advice online is to NOT start taking insurance. And to their point, building practice that is only private pay is the easier way to go from an administrative and even profit point of view. But there are some disadvantages to a cash or private pay practice vs. accepting insurance.
Here is an outline and a list of pros and cons for taking insurance payment directly vs. having a strictly private pay. I think the decision to go one way or the other depends on your location in the country and several other factors. So here are some of those factors to consider.
In order to begin taking insurance there are several things that have to be done in advance on the front end to enable you to be credentialed with insurance companies. There is a credentialing process and this takes a good bit of time and effort to do. The place I always tell people to start is getting into the CAQH database and setting up your account with them. They are one of the major credentialing clearinghouses for the medical profession and who most of the major insurance companies use to use for credentialing. Once you have gotten your information into their database, you will then need to start contacting insurance companies to see if they are accepting any new providers. And if they are, you will need to go through their application process. Once credentialed, they will have you sign a contract with them that sets the rate that you are allowed to charge their patients within their network. Just like when we go to the doctor and have health insurance.
Once you are credentialed, the patient brings you their insurance card and numbers to be able to file a claim. Once you have had the session and collect their co-pay or deductible, you then need to file the claim with the insurance company to get paid for the rest of what is owed for the session. How you file the claim is usually through electronic means which has become the standard of industry. In fact, most insurance companies have begun switch to totally electronic claims and will not accept paper claims at all.
To file electronically, you either have to go to the insurance company website or use an insurance clearing house to do that for you. Then the insurance company has 45 days to pay the claim or reject it…
Why would someone take insurance?
So why in the world would someone go through all of that just to get paid a lower rate with more work involved?
The answer to that lies in several factors. I live in a mostly rural area that has lower average incomes than you might find in larger metropolitan areas. From what I know of the demographics here my area of the country, most people are very dependent on insurance benefits for their healthcare. My hunch is that if I stopped taking insurance my client load would drop. I am not sure if it is this way in other places, but the typical calls I get when people are seeking the services of a therapists is, am I taking new patients and do you accept my insurance?
The other thing I know, is that for some of the folks I am seeing in my practice, they would not be able to afford a rate that I would need to charge in order to get the care they need. They are dependent on their insurance to get what they need. They can afford a $20 co-pay but would not be able to afford the $90-$125 per session fee if they paid strictly out of pocket each week. So one way to look at it is that they might go somewhere else or not come to therapy at all if I did not take their insurance.
The Pros and Cons
- Brings in a larger number of referrals quickly that are generated by the insurance carriers
- Use of health insurance is the norm for receiving mental health care nationally
- Probably more advantageous for practices in rural communities
- A greater diversity of clients
- Gives the practice some credibility in that the insurance company has credentialed you
- Lower cost for the client
- Other professionals (doctors) will refer to others in their same networks
- Gives lower income clients an opportunity to use your services
- Credentialing process is tedious and time consuming
- Filing claims is an extra burden and time consuming
- Rejected claims stop you from being paid in a timely manner
- Ultimately requires having to have other software and systems in place
- You are “stuck” with having the insurance companies determining your reimbursement rate for their patients
- Might require having a medical billing or other auxiliary staff to handle filing claim
- You can charge what you want to with higher average rates per session
- No delays in getting paid for services
- No claims or paperwork to file
- Less likely to need auxiliary staff
- Will be more appealing to clients of higher economic standing
- You will have to work harder at building referral sources
- Requires that you educate clients on not using insurance
- Might lose clients that are searching for a therapist that will take their insurance
- Potentially smaller referral source pool
- Rural and lower socioeconomic communities will have limited access to services
- Limits taking on many low income or people that depend on insurance coverage
- Smaller diversity of clients
As I have grown I have been able to take insurance and give private pay offerings to clients that are appealing. I do offer a sliding scale fee for people that are not using insurance and/or do not have insurance. Some people that have insurance coverage choose to not use it their insurance benefits for therapy mainly to protect their confidentiality. Either that or their deductibles are very high and it is just a better deal for them to use the sliding scale.
Another good way to appeal to people that want to use their insurance benefits to pay for therapy, is to offer a “Superbill”. With a superbill, the client pays for the services out-of-pocket at your established rate. You would then give them a Superbill to turn into their insurance company to be reimbursed. The burden of collecting the money from insurance is placed on the client and not you. The downside of course is for the clients that might not be able to pay the out-of-pocket expense up front.
In the long run, psychologists, social workers, LPC’s, MFT’s and other psychotherapists in private practice need to evaluate their business model and decide what will work best for them. You also need to take into consideration your own values and ethics around how you get paid by clients. In theory, you do have more earning potential being strictly private pay. However, the bottom line is that you have to have clients coming through the doors regardless of how they pay. You also deserve to get paid what you are worth. I do not think there is any correct answer for this. Choose based on what is best for you and your clients.
L. Gordon Brewer, Jr. MEd, LMFT
Gordon is a contributing writer for the Just4Therapists Blog and is a Private Practice Consultant at The Practice Of Therapy (www.practiceoftherapy.com). His is also the owner of Kingsport Counseling Associates, PLLC a group private practice located in Kingsport, TN. Gordon has over 15 years experience in practice as a therapist and loves sharing what he has learned during that time. You can also find him at the Practice of Therapy Facebook Page, on Twitter (@Therapistlearn) and LinkedIn. You can download Gordon’s FREE Private Practice Start-Up Guide HERE.